Search results
The Supreme Court held that evidence obtained after a search and seizure was obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment and that the trial court erred in denying Defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence obtained as a result of the search and seizure.
The Supreme Court reversed the trial court's judgment granting Defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized during the search of his home, holding that a waiver of the "right against search and seizure" clearly informs the defendant that a search may be conducted without reasonable suspicion.
In Pirtle v. State, our Court relied on our State Constitution to require an advisement of rights prior to police obtaining consent to a search from a person in custody. So far, that requirement has been understood to apply only to searches of homes and vehicles.
Read important U.S. Supreme Court decisions involving Search & Seizure and learn about how the Justices have shaped the law in this area.
Case Summary Appellant-defendant John P. Myers appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress a handgun seized during a warrantless search of his vehicle. We affirm. Issue
2 cze 2023 · The decision in Lange v. California has significant implications for Fourth Amendment law. The decision clarifies the standard for determining when exigent circumstances justify a warrantless search and reinforce the importance of obtaining a warrant before conducting a search.
25 paź 2018 · Read State v. Crager, Court of Appeals Case No. 18A-CR-671, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database
