Search results
2 gru 2013 · In 2010, Bay Mills Indian Community used funds acquired through the Michigan Indian Land Claims Settlement Act to purchase property away from the tribe’s reservation and used the property to open a casino. Michigan sought an injunction to stop operation of the casino, which the state contends violates the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act ("IGRA") ...
Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community, 572 U.S. 782 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case examining whether a federal court has jurisdiction over activity that violates the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act but takes place off Indian lands, and, if so, whether tribal sovereign immunity prevents a state from suing in federal court. [1]
The United States brought this lawsuit against the State of Michigan in 1973, on its own behalf and on behalf of the Bay Mills Indian Community, “to protect the tribe’s rights to fish in certain waters of the Great Lakes” under the Treaty and to enjoin the State of Michigan’s alleged
Some courts, only display case numbers and information for criminal convictions if the sentencing occurred within seven years of the date of search in MiCOURT. These courts are identified with a check mark under the "7-Year Criminal Sentence Filter" column of the MiCOURT case search.
Gra na lekcji szkolnej, polegająca na jak najgłośniejszym powiedzeniu chuj poprzez np. kichanie, kaszlanie, lub nawet śmianie. -Ej gramy w chuja? -Ok, zaczynaj. -*kicha* teraz ty.
Grać w chuja to metaforyczne określenie stosowane w sytuacji, gdy ktoś oszukuje, kręci lub celowo próbuje kogoś wprowadzić w błąd. Przykłady użycia określenia grać w chuja – Słyszałeś, że Kamil rozstał się z Andżeliką?
Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 494 U.S. 652 (1990), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance regulations. The majority opinion authored by Thurgood Marshall held that the Michigan Campaign Finance Act, which burdened political speech by prohibiting corporations from using treasury money to make independent expenditures to support or oppose ...
