Yahoo Poland Wyszukiwanie w Internecie

Search results

  1. 17 cze 2024 · Tinker recognizes the ability to maintain freedom of expression via items of clothing and, via its later citings, freedom of speech and religion, as long as a student does not threaten or cause any damage or distraction within the school environment.

  2. 27 lut 2016 · This paper explores student-teachers' understanding of the right to freedom of expression in education. Analyses of case law and legal principles affirm that the right to freedom of expression is an essential prerequisite to protect and promote democracy.

  3. 10 maj 2021 · The First Amendment dominates debate about freedom of speech in the United States. Yet it is not the only legal instrument that protects expressive freedom, the rights of the institutional press, or the democratic values that these rights facilitate.

  4. 21 wrz 2021 · This fifty-year retrospective on Virginia’s 1971 constitutional revision argues that state constitutional language has both the power and promise to effect policy change in the area of educational equity. In the years after Brown, Virginia dramatically resisted efforts to integrate.

  5. As representatives of the state, school administrators can censor, restrain, or refuse to publish school-sponsored student expression if it interferes with the requirements of school discipline, interferes with students' rights, interferes with academic propriety, generates health or welfare concerns, or is deemed obscene or vulgar. [12]

  6. 19 paź 2017 · By focussing on the mandates that support children’s right to freedom of expression and opinion and critically examining the literature that evidences the child’s rights in practice, the key barriers to the full realisation of children’s communication and participatory rights in education can be identified and addressed.

  7. freedom of expression.” Symposium participants have accordingly fashioned their papers in the context of treasured, traditional standards of free speech, which are closely aligned with the formal doctrinal princi-ples of the First Amendment.1 We have heard invoked the wise words of Brandeis’s magnificent concurrence in Whitney v.

  1. Ludzie szukają również