Search results
The Department of Education and local school boards shall adopt policies to implement the provisions of 20 U.S.C. § 7926 that prohibit any local school board or any individual who is an employee, contractor, or agent of a local school board from assisting an employee, contractor, or agent of such local school board in obtaining a new job if ...
Freedom of speech in schools in the United States. The issue of school speech or curricular speech as it relates to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution has been the center of controversy and litigation since the mid-20th century. The First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech applies to students in the public schools.
17 cze 2024 · Even though strictly “obscene” content is unprotected by the freedom of speech, the court did not classify the newspaper under this category, meaning Papish and her expression remained intact and the school could not punish her without significant proof of harm or concern for the school community.
As representatives of the state, school administrators can censor, restrain, or refuse to publish school-sponsored student expression if it interferes with the requirements of school discipline, interferes with students' rights, interferes with academic propriety, generates health or welfare concerns, or is deemed obscene or vulgar. [12]
However, this section shall not prohibit the disclosure of such information to (i) a local school board or division superintendent for the purpose of permitting such board or superintendent to consider or to take personnel action with regard to an employee or (ii) any requester, after the conclusion of a review or investigation, in a form that ...
opposing a policy that might burden his freedoms of expression and religion, his interest in doing so was compelling. "We believe Cross has a strong claim to the view that his public dissent implicates fundamental societal values deeply imbedded in our Constitutional Republic," giving sufficient weight to the School Board's
Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the absence of proof of the teacher knowingly or recklessly making false statements the teacher had a right to speak on issues of public importance without being dismissed from their position. [1]
