Search results
9 wrz 2019 · The collection of essays edited by Christine Landfried cogently illuminates a variety of answers. Its carefully positive assessment of judicial power hinges on an actual and demonstrable difference between judicial and political modes of decision-making (at 3).
18 kwi 2021 · The empirical analyses focus on centralized constitutional courts and in particular the German Federal Constitutional Court (GFCC). A comparative assessment among European countries shows that Germany is a representative case to study the two faces of judicial power (see Chapter 3).
9 maj 2016 · Some decisions disclose a problematic exercise of judicial power, even if the substantive outcome in the cases is desirable. We include an admittedly rather rough and ready description of each case, and (where available) a link to the full judgment.
18 kwi 2021 · The indices show that the GFCC is a representative case to study judicial power. Assessing the judicial–political processes around Germany’s parental custody reform from 1998 puts the hypotheses on the two faces of judicial power to a preliminary test. Download chapter PDF.
research, this paper finds that judicial reform is successful in improving court effectiveness when it coincides with or is motivated by periods of extraordinary politics.
5 gru 2017 · The article begins by setting out the principal argument of the Judicial Power Project, henceforth JPP. It then assesses the JPP’s claims from four perspectives: individual cases, judicial review doctrine, judicial practice and the theory of adjudication.
1 sty 2013 · This chapter provides a comparative analysis of the organisational structure of the judiciaries, judicial power and various models of judicial administration practised in different legal systems. Focus is geared towards highlighting the relevance of organisational...
