Search results
We explore that question in Mitchell versus Wisconsin. Police received a report that Gerald Mitchell was driving while intoxicated. Officer Alexander Jaeger responded to the call and located...
Mitchell v. Wisconsin (2019) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary - YouTube. The Supreme Court is deciding if Wisconsin's implied consent law allows for a blood draw without a warrant for...
I work relentlessly on trying to find original cases forgotten in time that you've likely never heard of. If you have a case you'd like me to look into, feel free to email me to:...
Gerald Mitchell was arrested for drunk driving in Wisconsin. Due to his high level of intoxication, Mitchell became unconscious by the time the police attempted a formal breath test. Consequently, the police obtained a blood sample without a warrant while Mitchell was unconscious.
The central issue was whether the regulatory actions by Wisconsin and St. Croix County, which essentially merged the Murr's two lots preventing their separate sale or development, constituted a 'taking' under the Fifth Amendment requiring just compensation.
The Supreme Court's reasoning in Wisconsin v. Mitchell is nuanced and addresses several key legal principles surrounding the First Amendment, the nature of conduct versus speech, the role of motive in criminal sentencing, and the specific societal harms of bias-motivated crimes.
1 lip 2009 · The library provides public access to the WI Supreme Court and Court of Appeals briefs and appendices for all cases ordered published or unpublished, starting with the first case heard in each court (1839 for the WI Supreme Court; 1978 for the WI Court of Appeals).
