Search results
26 lis 2018 · 4. Conclusion: Knowledge without Certainty. Descartes was impressed by the Cogito because he had found a belief that is certain and so, when believed, cannot be false. He thought that certainty was necessary for a belief to be known.
3 gru 2008 · Descartes’ conclusion in Meditation VI that the senses do not reveal the “essential nature” of external objects (7:83) differs from his position in the Rules. In that work, he allowed that some “simple natures” pertaining to corporeal things can be known through the images of the senses (10:383, 417).
An annotated summary of Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy. For each major step in the argument, a note specifies the relevant key passage from the meditations that signify that step. This is an aid for students.
3 lip 2017 · With his method of doubt, he rejected all previous beliefs, allowing only those that survived rigorous scrutiny. In this essay, Leslie Allan examines whether Descartes’s program of skeptical enquiry was successful in laying a firm foundation for our manifold beliefs.
Rene Descartes, French mathematician and philosopher, generally regarded as the founder of modern Western philosophy. He is known for his epistemological foundationalism as expressed in the cogito (‘I think, therefore I am’), his metaphysical dualism, and his rationalism based on innate ideas of mind, matter, and God.
The conclusion I reach is that if the Meditations are interpreted in an exemplary foundationalist fashion, then Descartes’s epistemoiogy may be capable of at least weakening the kinds of sceptical attacks levelled against foundationalism and although it may not provide a definitive account of knowledge possession as Descartes surely
In the Objections and Replies, Descartes discusses whether the Cogito, ‘I am thinking, therefore I exist’, should be understood as a syllogism. It looks plausible to interpret the Cogito syllogistically: 1) (Minor premise) I am thinking. 2) (Major premise) Whatever thinks, exists. (Conclusion) I exist.
