Search results
27 gru 2011 · Performance gains via memory even when given a favorable playing field (reduced graphics) are pretty small. The reference CAS 9 1600 appeared to hold its own at a fraction of the cost.
23 lis 2014 · We’ve found that tweaking RAM settings has very little payoff in terms of performance, particularly given the increased chance for system instability, so running at a kit’s specified settings (provided in the XMP profile) is typically a good approach.
In reality the top three contenders yield the same average performance between the two tests, and have yet to prove noticeably advantageous against the reference DDR3-1600 CAS 9.
16 lis 2011 · but remember one more thing. reviews might say you can OC it to say 1866 or even 2133 with loser timings and higher voltages, but don't ride by that assumption that you will get the same results. if you want to be sure, get RAM with higher rated clocks.
5 gru 2013 · No, true DRAM performance is a combination of high freq and low CL - within a given freq look for the lower CL i.e. 1866/8 vs 1866/10 the 8 is much better (the CL is the number of clock...
14 sie 2013 · Overall performance was lower than expected, even though overclocking was solid and memory clock was high. Today, we take a look at another Hynix MFR IC based kit, the ADATA XPG DDR3-2600, but it’s double sided and gives us 16 GB total.
5 wrz 2011 · DDR3-1866 Benchmark Results. We left secondary and tertiary timings at the manufacturer’s discretion, and included reference DDR3-1333 CAS 9 results as our performance baseline.
