Search results
Overview. Put simply, Hume defines a miracle as a violation of a law of nature (understood as a regularity of past experience projected by the mind to future cases) [1] and argues that the evidence for a miracle is never sufficient for rational belief because it is more likely that a report of a miracle is false as a result of misperception, ...
30 sty 2011 · Fucking miracles. Occasionally someone insists that somewhere, for some period of time, the laws of nature stopped working and something absolutely batshit insane happened, like the sun danced in the sky or a bro rose from the dead, and he expects you to take him at his word.
Chapter 10 Summary: “Of Miracles”. Hume addresses the possibility of miracles along with evidence for Christianity, which he calls “less than the evidence for the truth of our senses” (79). Experience is not the only trustworthy guide in these matters and “is not altogether infallible” (79).
Nothing is esteemed a miracle, if it ever happen in the common course of nature. It is no miracle that a man, seemingly in good health, should die on a sudden: because such a kind of death, though more unusual than any other, has yet been frequently observed to happen.
A short summary of David Hume's An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. This free synopsis covers all the crucial plot points of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.
In the very paragraph where Hume first defines ‘miracle,’ he says that “it is a miracle, that a dead man should come to life” (E 115: 143). What is more revealing is the reason he gives: “because that has never been observed in any age or country.”
