Search results
A summary of Section X in David Hume's An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Learn exactly what happened in this chapter, scene, or section of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding and what it means. Perfect for acing essays, tests, and quizzes, as well as for writing lesson plans.
A miracle may be accurately defined a transgression of a law of nature by a particular volition of the Deity or by the interposition of some invisible agent .
30 sty 2011 · You can’t prove religion via miracles, because you can’t prove miracles. Your complete suspension of reason in favor of faith is your business, but if you try to 'prove’ your religion based on reason, I’m going to embarrass you.
Hume on Miracles, Part 2. Main points. There were three parts to this session. An interpretive question about what Hume meant to do in Part 1 and, implicitly, what he meant to do in Part 2. The four reasons for doubting testimony concerning miracles in Part 2. The conclusion of Part 2. One: interpretive question.
for the assertion that “there never was a miraculous event established on so full an evidence.”2 Understood in a certain way, Hume’s presenta-tion presents a challenge to the believer of miracles, especially the believ-er of biblical miracles. Being such a believer, I am therefore faced with
The argument described is a form of demonstration, seeking to rule out miracles on the basis of relations of ideas; a miracle is defined as a violation of a law of nature; but a law of nature is defined as exceptionless, inviolable; therefore the ‘miracle’ shows the putative law not to be a law after all; therefore no law has been violated ...
My aim here is to summarise what I take to be the most plausible views on these issues, both interpretative and phi-losophical, with references to facilitate deeper investigation if desired. The paper is divided into small sections, each headed by a question that provides a focus. Broadly speaking, §§13 and §20 are on.
