Search results
A summary of Section X in David Hume's An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Learn exactly what happened in this chapter, scene, or section of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding and what it means. Perfect for acing essays, tests, and quizzes, as well as for writing lesson plans.
A miracle may be accurately defined a transgression of a law of nature by a particular volition of the Deity or by the interposition of some invisible agent .
Hume on Miracles, Part 2. Main points. There were three parts to this session. An interpretive question about what Hume meant to do in Part 1 and, implicitly, what he meant to do in Part 2. The four reasons for doubting testimony concerning miracles in Part 2. The conclusion of Part 2. One: interpretive question.
The argument described is a form of demonstration, seeking to rule out miracles on the basis of relations of ideas; a miracle is defined as a violation of a law of nature; but a law of nature is defined as exceptionless, inviolable; therefore the ‘miracle’ shows the putative law not to be a law after all; therefore no law has been violated ...
8 sie 2021 · Hume defines a miracles as “a violation of the laws of nature” (p.124) and argues that there must “be a uniform experience against every miraculous event, otherwise the event would not merit that appellation” (p.125).
30 sty 2011 · So far, no miracle has even close to enough people testifying for it, much less trustworthy people. You say a hundred people witnessed the miracle? Funny how that miracle would entirely confirm the religious beliefs of all hundred of them - what a strange coincidence!
“in fact” argument,1 Part 2 of David Hume’s “Of Miracles” is, prima facie, a rather complex presentation of the various reasons for the assertion that “there never was a miraculous event established on so full an evidence.”2 Understood in a certain way, Hume’s presenta-
