Search results
recover profits or damages unless the acts have been committed with knowledge that such imitation is intended to be used to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive. As used in this paragraph, the term "any
The Lanham Act bars trademark infringement and false advertising in nearly identical and often overlapping language. In some circumstances, courts have interpreted the two provisions in the same way, but in other areas there has been significant doctrinal divergence, often to the detriment of the law. This Ar-
2 cze 2023 · To fall within the “zone of interest” of the Lanham Act, a false advertising plaintiff must allege an injury to “a commercial interest in reputation or sales.”. For proximate causation, the plaintiff must show “economic or reputational injury” flowing directly from deception created by the defendant’s advertising.
The Lanham Act provides civil liability for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, cybersquatting, and false advertising. The act gives U.S. district courts nonexclusive jurisdiction over these lawsuits, meaning that plaintiffs may choose to file such lawsuits either in federal or state court.
This article describes the contours of federal false advertising suits, and addresses several issues unique to false advertising litigation involving prescription and OTC drugs. False Advertising Under the Lanham Act. False advertising suits typically are brought under the federal trademark statute known as the Lanham Act.
with the Lanham Act. False advertising suits brought in federal court under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act are a potent weapon to combat a competitor’s false and misleading promotional statements. A plaintiff who prevails on a Lanham Act claim can obtain prompt relief that has real and immediate commercial impact, most notably
1 lip 2005 · What Constitutes False Advertising Under The Lanham Act Like Section 17500 of the UCL, Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act is designed to protect both consumers as well as competitors.
