Search results
7 mar 2022 · A proposed class action alleges CUSIP Global Services, S&P Global, FactSet Research Systems and the American Bankers Association have conspired for decades to eliminate competition for the use of CUSIPs, an identification number system for securities.
18 mar 2022 · In the case of CUSIP numbers, a strong intellectual property claim hinders our ability to monitor state and local debt. If the copyright restriction is lifted, those of us who monitor government finance will be able to create and distribute government debt data sets at little or no cost.
2 sty 2023 · The claim: "Defendants CUSIP Global Services (“CGS”), S&P Global, Inc. (“S&P”), and the American Bankers Association (“ABA”) have conspired for decades to eliminate competition in the use of...
4 mar 2022 · A complaint filed March 4 seeks judgement on whether Cusip Global Services, S&P Global, the American Bankers Association, and (now) FactSet have violated copyright laws as well as the Sherman Antitrust Act by charging hefty licensing fees to use the industry utility.
8 sie 2022 · Three financial firms have joined forces to file an amended class-action lawsuit against Cusip Global Services (CGS), S&P Global, FactSet, and the American Bankers Association (ABA), alleging violations of US antitrust laws, breach of contract, and violations of New York and Connecticut unfair business practice statutes, after a federal judge ...
8 mar 2022 · The class action complaint alleges that the Defendants extract the subscription fees through unfair, deceptive, and threatening business practices throughout the United States, including by threatening to cut off investors’ access to data, typically provided by third parties (e.g., Bloomberg) that is essential to the continuation of investors’ b...
4 mar 2022 · Class Action Complaint alleging the defendants “have conspired for decades to eliminate competition in the use of CUSIPs – the “CUSIP Use Market” in Dinosaur Financial Group LLC, of New York, USA, and Swiss Life Investment Management Holding AG, of Zurich, Switzerland v.
