Search results
30 maj 2017 · Mendez and his wife (respondents here) filed suit under Rev. Stat. §1976, 42 U. S. C. §1983, against petitioners, the County of Los Angeles and Deputies Conley and Pederson. As relevant here, they pressed three Fourth Amendment claims.
22 mar 2017 · Unanimous decision for County of Los Angeles majority opinion by Samuel A. Alito, Jr. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s provocation rule has no basis in the Fourth Amendment, and that the lower court erroneously conflated multiple Fourth Amendment violation claims.
22 mar 2017 · Reply of petitioners County of Los Angeles, California, et al. filed. (Distributed) Mar 22 2017. Argued. For petitioners: E. Joshua Rosenkranz, New York, N. Y.; and Nicole A. Saharsky, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
Szukasz niezawodnych opon samochodowych? Zapoznaj się z szeroką ofertą opon Continental. Znajdź punkty sprzedaży opon Continental w najbliższej okolicy!
30 maj 2017 · Mendez and his wife (respondents here) filed suit under Rev. Stat. §1976, 42 U. S. C. §1983, against petitioners, the County of Los Angeles and Deputies Conley and Pederson. As relevant here, they pressed three Fourth Amendment claims.
Los Angeles County v. Humphries, 562 U.S. 29 (2010), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that clarified one of the requirements for imposing liability on a municipality for violations of a federal right, in lawsuits brought under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1983).
6 dni temu · The California Appellate Courts Case Information System provides case information for California Supreme Court and Court of Appeal cases, including copies of opinions, both published and unpublished. Case information is updated once an hour throughout the business day.
