Search results
Holding: The Supreme Court affirmed the trial/appellate interpretations of the all-sums issue, holding each insurer liable (subject to policy limits) for the total amount of state's losses associated with the continuous property damage.
19 wrz 2012 · Opinion. No. S170560. 2012-09-19. The STATE of California, Plaintiff, Cross–Defendant and Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants, Cross–Complainants and Appellants; Employers Insurance of Wausau, Defendant, Cross–Complainant and Respondent.
The California Supreme Court affirmed a Court of Appeal decision holding insurers liable for “all sums” – meaning, the full amount of a loss up to an insurer’s policy limit – for continuous injury claims.
29 wrz 2017 · Affirming the award of mandatory and discretionary prejudgment interest in a case involving multiple insurers and their liability for the cleanup of a hazardous waste site on account of California Supreme Court caselaw relating to continuous loss over multiple policy periods.
16 mar 2009 · S170560 - STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE. Hearing Date: May 29, 2012 to May 31, 2012. Subscribe to this Case. Defendants, Cross-Complainants and Appellants, Continental Insurance Company, et al., and Defendant, Cross-Complainant and Respondent, Employers Insurance of Wausau, Reply Brief.
29 wrz 2017 · OPINION. This is an action by the State of California (State) to recover from various insurers the costs of cleaning up the Stringfellow hazardous waste site. It has been pending since 1993. It has been to this court three times and to the California Supreme Court twice.
You will find the most recent Supreme Court opinions below. The court’s opinions establish precedent that must be followed by all California appellate and superior courts. Opinions of the California Supreme Court are published in bound volumes called the Official California Reports, as well as by private publishers, in hard copy and on line.
