Search results
Holding: The Supreme Court affirmed the trial/appellate interpretations of the all-sums issue, holding each insurer liable (subject to policy limits) for the total amount of state's losses associated with the continuous property damage.
In Sapugay, Respondent Mobil Philippines filed before the trial court of Pasig an action for replevin against Spouses Marino and Lina Joel Sapugay. The Complaint arose from the supposed failure of the couple to keep their end of their Dealership Agreement.
16 mar 2009 · S170560 - STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE. Hearing Date: May 29, 2012 to May 31, 2012. Subscribe to this Case. Defendants, Cross-Complainants and Appellants, Continental Insurance Company, et al., and Defendant, Cross-Complainant and Respondent, Employers Insurance of Wausau, Reply Brief.
6 lut 2024 · The case stems from a transaction between Lafarge Cement Philippines, Inc. (hereafter Lafarge), and its co-petitioners, and Continental Cement Corporation (CCC) alongside respondents Gregory T. Lim and Anthony A. Mariano.
No. 239784 BY THE COURT: MODIFICATION OF OPINION The opinion, State of California v. Continental Insurance Company et al., filed August 9, 2012, and apprearing at 55 Cal.4th 186, is modified as follows: 1.
9 sie 2012 · Case opinion for CA Supreme Court State of California v. Continental Ins. Co.. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
The California Supreme Court affirmed a Court of Appeal decision holding insurers liable for “all sums” – meaning, the full amount of a loss up to an insurer’s policy limit – for continuous injury claims. The Supreme Court also approved stacking.