Search results
Case opinion for US Supreme Court VILLAGE OF EUCLID, OHIO v. AMBLER REALTY CO.. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
On July 8, 1996, the Sixth Circuit affirmed this Court's judgment, and on September 19, 1996, denied Euclid's petition for rehearing. Cleveland Area Bd. of Realtors v. City of Euclid, 88 F.3d 382 (6th Cir. 1996).
CABOR claims that the Euclid ordinances violate the United States and Ohio Constitutions, denying freedom of speech, due process, and equal protection, and seeks injunctive relief to prevent the enforcement of the ordinances.
When initially heard by the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, the village moved to dismiss the complaint entirely, arguing that Ambler Realty had no right to sue in the first place without taking the issue before the Euclid Zoning Board, as required by the zoning ordinance.
Ambler brought suit against Euclid, alleging that the zoning ordinance violated the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, as well as the Ohio Constitution, by depriving Ambler of liberty and property without due process.
Did the village of Euclid's zoning ordinance violate Ambler Realty's rights to liberty and property under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment?
21 lut 2020 · The landmark case of Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926) , decided by the United States Supreme Court, established that zoning laws were legal under the government's traditional police powers to promote the public's health, safety, and welfare.
