Search results
4 lut 2019 · A Note on Book Reviews. The American Historical Review tries to review as many historiographical monographs as possible. Of the over 2,200–2,500 books a year that we receive, we usually prove able to review slightly more than one-third. The figure for 2018 was 35.1 percent.
The AHR seeks to review genres of scholarship that make historical knowledge available to the discipline at large and the general public. We invite proposals for these kinds of reviews. All reviews are assigned in consultation with the Board of Editors and Associate Review Editors.
The American Historical Review (AHR) is the official publication of the American Historical Association (AHA). The AHR has been the journal of record for the historical profession in the United States since 1895 …. Find out more.
Jennifer Day, the editor of the Chicago Tribune’s Sunday books section, Printer’s Row Journal, discusses her commitment to assembling the best literary criticism on both.
Search the journal. The American Historical Review (AHR) is the official publication of the American Historical Association (AHA). The AHA was founded in 1884 and chartered by Congress in 1889 to serve the interests of the entire discipline of history.
My focus in this article is on book reviews written by American historians and physicists in the American Historical Review, Physical Review, and Science from 1900 until 1940. I show that book reviewers in these journals assessed not only results and methods of authors but also authors themselves.
The journal is overseen by a board of editors and a team of associate review editors. From the October 2007 issue until 2011, the journal was published by the University of Chicago Press . As of 2023, the journal has been published by the Oxford University Press .
