Search results
The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Tenth District Court of Appeals compelling the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) to reverse its denial of Appellant's application for disability benefits, holding that there was no error.
14 gru 2020 · On April 23, 2010, Arakas filed an application for Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) benefits, alleging disability based on various conditions including fibromyalgia, carpal tunnel syndrome, and degenerative disc disease.
See, e.g., id. at ¶ 47-51 (finding estoppel could not be applied against a public retirement board and citing several decisions in which this court refused to apply promissory estoppel to the retirement systems as a matter of law); State ex rel. Simpson v.
Employees Retirement System (“OPERS”), to reverse its denial of Powell’s application for disability benefits. The Tenth District denied the writ because
Declares that, first, by providing that the measure consisting in lowering the retirement age of the judges of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) is to apply to judges in post who were appointed to that court before 3 April 2018 and, secondly, by granting the President of the Republic the discretion to extend the period of judicial ...
In Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. Betts, 492 U.S. 158, 109 S.Ct. 2854, 106 L.Ed.2d 134 (1989), the Supreme Court held that age based classifications in benefit plans were expected to exist despite the broad remedial purposes of the Age Discrimination Act.
mandamus ordering respondent, Ohio Public Employees Retirement System ("OPERS"), to vacate its order denying relator's application for disability benefits, and grant such benefits retroactive to the date of application.
