Yahoo Poland Wyszukiwanie w Internecie

Search results

  1. On 28 September 2017, the arbitration tribunal made a final award. The arbitration award ordered Poland to pay the sum of 653 639 384 zlotys (PLN) (approximately EUR 150 million), together with an amount of interest, to PL Holdings and to pay the company’s costs of the arbitra- tion proceedings.

  2. www.arkas.plArkas

    Design. Zawsze poszukujemy atrakcyjnych rozwiązań wzorniczych. Nadajemy w ten sposób produktowi unikalny charakter, ale i przekazujemy w nim cząstkę samych siebie. Kontakt: Telefony kontaktowe: +48 768711970 - 74. Dział reklamacji: 606 318 132. Sekretariat: sekretariat@arkas.pl. Dział handlowy: dzialhandlowy@arkas.pl.

  3. The Republic of Poland brought an appeal against the decision of the Svea hovrätt (Svea Court of Appeal, Stockholm), before the referring court, the Högsta domstolen (Supreme Court, Sweden), which considers it established that the arbitration clause in Article 9 of the BIT is contrary to EU law.

  4. www.arkas.pl › indexArkas.pl

    ARKAS Sp. z o.o. Sąd Rejonowy dla Wrocławia Fabrycznej, IX Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego pod numerem KRS :0000021634 NIP: 695-14-01-919 ; REGON 390937820; Wysokość kapitału zakładowego: 592.000,00 PLN Informacje o plikach cookie. Ta strona używa plików Cookies. ...

  5. 26 paź 2021 · Furthermore, as the case involves a €150 million dispute between Poland and PL Holdings, a Luxembourg-based company ordered by the Polish authority in 2014 to sell 99% of its stake in a Polish bank, the judgment will have some far-reaching implications for the almost closed case.

  6. 28 cze 2017 · 26 Nov 2014. Status of the case: Decided in favor of investor. Claimant’s country of origin: Luxembourg. Respondent: Poland. Institution: SCC (Stockholm Chamber of Commerce) Rules of arbitration: SCC Arbitration Rules 2010. Seat of arbitration: Stockholm. Applicable treaties: BLEU - Poland BIT (1987) Documents of the case. See all other documents.

  7. On June 25, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Ohio v. American Express Co., [1] which dismissed 5-4 an antitrust suit against American Express Co. (Amex) instituted under Section 1 of the Sherman Act by the U.S. Department of Justice and a group of state attorneys general.

  1. Ludzie szukają również