Search results
International human rights law imposes obligations on States that have jurisdiction over facts occurring in the ‘grey zone’, namely, the territorial State and the outside State.
- 2 The Legal Effect of Effective Control Over Territory
In international human rights law, ‘jurisdiction’ is the...
- International Human Rights Law Beyond State Territorial Control
International human rights law can normalise an imperfect,...
- 2 The Legal Effect of Effective Control Over Territory
Empirical international relations (IR) theory developed three generalized statements regarding why human rights abuses occur. First, human rights abuses are a way for an unrestrained state, especially the executive branch and its agents, to try to control individuals and hold on to power.
20 lis 2021 · Human rights are a natural right that a person is born with; they cannot be taken away and their existence cannot be denied; in addition, human rights serve as accolades. Human rights and the...
20 sty 2017 · In section I, we set the stage for the subsequent discussion by clarifying the relationship between international law on state jurisdiction (or the state system), the universal objective of human rights treaties, and individual state’s obligations under such treaties.
Under international human rights law, the breach of human rights and its consequences lie with a contracting state rather than the perpetrator, because only states have the power and the duty to establish the laws and maintain institutions that ensure the respect and protection of such rights.
3 lis 2021 · In international human rights law ‘jurisdiction’ and what it means is the centre of the debate on extraterritorial obligations. These are obligations stemming from international human rights law that a state owes to individuals who are not within its territory.
1 cze 2023 · Unlike moral rights, legal human rights need to be capable of being codified in a relatively simple list that is stable across time rather than being frequently revised. In addition, courts necessarily have limited information available about the consequences of their decisions.
