Search results
the court case Abbeville v. the State of South Carolina as the plaintiffs pursued a more equitable source of funding for public education. This study was also to provide a historical account of the litigations challenging the constitutionality of K-12 funding across the nation.
A police car, with its headlights on, was placed between Brower’s oncoming car and the truck, facing Brower’s car, effectively blinding Brower. The family sued, claiming a violation of the Fourth Amendment’s right to be free from unreasonable seizures.
16 sie 2024 · In the landmark Terry v. Ohio case, the Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of police "stop and frisk" procedures. The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. Before the Court decided Terry in 1968, searches and seizures generally required probable cause for arrest and a warrant.
6 kwi 2017 · Case summary for Hudson v. Michigan: Police arrived at Hudson’s home after obtaining a warrant. Three to five seconds after announcing their presence, police entered Hudson’s home and found drugs and a firearm. At trial, Hudson moved to have the evidence suppressed, claiming that the violation of the knock and announce rule violated his ...
View Verdict of History subject material by historical time period: Michigan and the Culture Wars, 1970 – To Present. Unborn Persons in Michigan: O’Neill v Morse (1971) – 385 Mich 130. Brief Summary of O’Neill. Majority Opinion.
Summers. No. 79-1794. Argued February 25, 1981 -- Decided June 22, 1981. 452 U.S. 692. Syllabus. When police officers executing a warrant to search a house for narcotics encountered respondent descending the front steps, they requested his assistance in gaining entry and detained him while they searched the premises.
13 sie 2020 · The Supreme Court's 1961 decision in Mapp v. Ohio made huge changes for the rights of those accused of a crime by deciding whether evidence gathered without a warrant was admissible in state court. Find out more on FindLaw's Supreme Court Insights.
