Search results
Mens’ or Men’s. Men’s is the plural possessive form of men. When the noun already ends in “s” and we want to make the word possessive, we need to put the apostrophe after the “s”. In this case, the plural is irregular and “men” doesn’t end in “s” so we need to add “s” to men.
- Mans or Man’s or Mans’ (English Grammar Explained)
Men’s is the plural possessive form of men. When the noun...
- Mans or Man’s or Mans’ (English Grammar Explained)
26 lip 2020 · While you're in school you can spell it men's (also women's, children's, oxen's, sheep's, deer's) with just plain old Apostrophe-S. You can't tell the singular from the plural possessive in speech, so there's no reason to do it in writing, either.
21 mar 2022 · The short answer is that the correct word is men’s (to show possession). There is no such spelling as mens and mens.’ This article will explore the meaning of each of these spellings and discuss when to use each one.
Men’s is the plural possessive form of men. When the noun already ends in “s” and we want to make the word possessive, we need to put the apostrophe after the “s”. In this case, the plural is irregular and “men” doesn’t end in “s” so we need to add “s” to men.
13 paź 2017 · To show possession of these particular plural words, the correct way would be to treat them as singular: Men's wear. Children's wear. Source: http://crofsblogs.typepad.com/english/2007/07/mens-or-mens.html. @published is incorrect, but the confusion is understandable.
2 lip 2007 · Mens' or Men's? Jody asks: I am in an argument with a sign maker at the high school I'm building. I say it should be Men's Locker Room. He said it's Mens' because Men is plural. Same with Women's Locker Room versus Womens'. Who is correct? You are, and here's why:
The plural of 'man' is 'men.' If you are talking about more than one man, you can’t simply throw the letter s on the end of 'man' and call it a day, even if that is what you would do with the word boy. There are rules for changing singular to plural words, which are laid out more in-depth here.
