Yahoo Poland Wyszukiwanie w Internecie

Search results

  1. What interests us in these distinctions—Galilean idealization versus minimalist idealization, and uncontrolled versus controlled or harmless idealization—is that they crucially depend, although in different ways, on the possibility and desirability of deidealization in modeling.

  2. We question this assumption by analyzing the challenges of deidealization within a menu of four broad categories: deidealizing as recomposing, deidealizing as reformulating, de-idealizing as concretizing, and deidealizing as situating.

  3. 3 cze 2023 · We question this assumption by analyzing the challenges of deidealization within a menu of four broad categories: deidealizing as recomposing, deidealizing as reformulating, de-idealizing as...

  4. 27 sie 2024 · In this paper, we outline an alternative artifactual approach that does not make misrepresentation central for the analysis of idealization. We examine the contrast between the Hodgkin-Huxley ...

  5. Explores two recent approaches to scientific modeling: artifactualism and fictionalism. Investigates how the different kinds of models that scientists use in practice are idealized and deidealized. Considers the nature and functions of scientific fictions and epistemic artifacts.

  6. We question this assumption by analyzing the challenges of deidealization within a menu of four broad categories: deidealizing as recomposing, deidealizing as reformulating, deidealizing as concretizing, and deidealizing as situating.

  7. We question this assumption by analyzing the challenges of deidealization within a menu of four broad categories: deidealizing as recomposing, deidealizing as reformulating, deidealizing as concretizing, and deidealizing as situating.

  1. Ludzie szukają również