Search results
26 sie 2021 · From a practical standpoint, a 25 MHz 386DX can keep pace with a 33 MHz 386SX. Depending on the board you have, the difference can be even greater. Especially if the DX-based system has L2 cache memory available, which improves performance about 10%.
- Reveal Codes in Word Like Wordperfect
Make cleaning up a document easier by showing the...
- Disadvantages of Windows 3.1
Windows 3.1 was the first version that many people remember...
- Better Memory Management
Last Updated on September 13, 2023 by Dave Farquhar. After...
- Aztech Sound Cards
Last Updated on October 14, 2021 by Dave Farquhar. Sometimes...
- Recent Comments
WeirdEdge on Commodore could have owned AOL Quote...
- Privacy Policy
Cookies set by The Silicon Underground itself, if any, are...
- Reveal Codes in Word Like Wordperfect
In 1988, Intel introduced the 80386SX, most often referred to as the 386SX, a cut-down version of the 80386 with a 16-bit data bus, mainly intended for lower-cost PCs aimed at the home, educational, and small-business markets, while the 386DX remained the high-end variant used in workstations, servers, and other demanding tasks. The CPU ...
3 kwi 2024 · The economy 486SX vs the performance 486DX Intel released the 486SX in April 1991 and retroactively created the 486DX to counter AMD’s new 386 clone CPU. The actual difference between the 486 DX and SX has long been a topic of debate.
21 sie 2010 · orion24 said: The 40 MHz BUS of the 386 had its advantages, but the main bottlenech those days was CPU performance and the 486SX-25, even without L2 cache is faster than 386DX-40. In fact your 386 system seems quite advanced scoring 16.6 in 3dbench.
7 sty 2019 · The 386SX was basically a low-cost version that could be installed on a 16-bit 286-style motherboard/chipset. It's similar to the 8088 vs 8086.
The Intel386DX contains full 32 bit buses for external data, internal data, and address. The Intel386SX contains a smaller 16 bit external data bus, and a smaller 24 bit address bus. The Intel486DX contains a floating point unit, the Intel486SX does not.
29 sty 2024 · Performance comparison 386SX/25 vs 386DX/25. Hi all, I finally could answer the question of my childhood: how much faster was the 386DX/25 of my schoolmate compared to my 386SX/25. - The results might be a bit in more in favor of the DX since its 128kb Cache.
