Search results
19 mar 2017 · The tapered wing lands itself. The Warrior is much more comfortable inside for backseat passengers and it has a real baggage compartment. The Warrior has a much better useful load even against a 140 with the 160 STC. Having flown a 140 with the 160 conversion, I much preferred the Warrior.
29 lip 2024 · Explore highlighted key differences between Piper’s Cherokee and Warrior models, produced from 1964 to 1977. Before diving into the nitty gritty, you must first understand how aviation and a Hershey’s chocolate bar go hand in hand.
In 1977, Piper upgraded the Warrior to 160 hp (119 kW) PA-28-161, changing its name to Cherokee Warrior II. This aircraft had slightly improved aerodynamic wheel fairings introduced in 1978. Later models of the Warrior II, manufactured after July 1982, incorporated a gross weight increase to 2,440 pounds, giving a useful load over 900 pounds.
5 sie 2002 · With the Warrior (-161 - 160hp simple eh?) Piper added a new tapered wing (known as the Warrior wing) as well as the bigger engine. In addition they added some more windows to improve the astetics.
The Warrior is distinguished from its Piper Cherokee predecessors by its double-tapered wing and two-foot-wider wingspans. The first of the Warrior series came out in 1974, followed by the Piper Warrior II in 1977.
Performance Summary. Specifications. Warriors are primarily distinguished from their Cherokee predecessors by their double-tapered wing planform and two-foot-wider wingspans. Earlier Cherokee wings have the blocky, squarish, constant-chord wing planforms that came to be known as "Hershey Bar" wings. The first of the Warrior series came out in 1974.
30 lis 1999 · The Warrior differs from the trainer by having a longer range, higher gross weight, longer wingspan, and more room. Because the same engine is used, the Warrior's performance suffers a little by comparison.
