Search results
For case information from previous terms, we recommend starting with the Docket Search located on the California Courts website (external); you can search by case number, case name, or names of the parties associated with the case.
Search for case docket and related information. Information about cases before the California Supreme Court is available using the search bar near the top of this Web page. Additionally, on the Appellate Courts docket search, you can find the docket for a case (and related information) by searching for the docket number, case name, or names of ...
A search of digital information on a cell phone implicates substantially greater individual privacy interests than a brief physical search; data stored on a cell phone cannot itself be used as a weapon to harm an arresting officer or to effectuate an escape.
Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), [1] is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that the warrantless search and seizure of the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment. [2] [3]
29 kwi 2014 · In this case, the Supreme Court will decide whether cell phones can be subject to warrantless searches incident to an arrest. The Fourth Amendment prevents unreasonable searches and seizures; however, a search incident to arrest has been ruled reasonable.
22 mar 2017 · California, Supreme Court of the United States, (2014) Case Summary of Riley v. California: Riley was convicted of a shooting related offense after evidence seized from his cell phone (incident to his arrest) was used against him in court.
10 lis 2014 · The Supreme Court reversed the California Court of Appeal in Riley and affirmed the First Circuit in Wurie. 29 Writing for the Court, Chief Justice Roberts 30 held that the “answer to the question of what police must do before searching a cell phone seized incident to an arrest is . . . simple — get a warrant.” 31.
