Search results
Aristotle depicted the former in terms of “verbal oppositions” (see e.g. [3], p. 416) while ignoring the latter as an opposition altogether, after all. Last, but not least: what of nonclassical negations with respect to the theory of oppositions?
This essay revisits opposition theory not only as a viable theory for understanding conceptual structure, but also as a powerful technique for establishing the interconnectedness of language ...
1 sty 2002 · Conflict talk occurs due to specific rhetoric features, communicative styles, ironic and sarcastic speech modality (Kallmeyer & Keim, 1996), verbal communication styles and thinking patterns...
Aristotle depicted the former in terms of “verbal oppositions” (see e.g. [3], p. 416) while ignoring the latter as an opposition altogether, after all. Last, but not least: what of non-classical negations with respect to the theory of oppositions? While Aristotle clearly linked
Moretti’s question-answer game for logical oppositions consists of 2 questions about the compossible truth-values of the opposed sentences α and ψ. Let Φ = Op(α, ψ), with the two ensuing questions “Can α and ψ be true together?” and “Can α and ψ be false together?”.
15 lip 2017 · PDF | An overview of the definitions of conflict talk reveals that they are given from the perspectives of causes, forms and design features.
Illocutionary oppositions are reformulated correspondingly in terms of compossible truth-claim values rather than truth-values. Definition 8. An opposition is a set of answers to questions about compossible truth-claims for the statement ♣α and its opposite opX(♣α) (where ♣∈{A, R} and X∈{I, N,C, D}).
