Search results
15 kwi 2016 · United States v. Texas is one of the most — if not the most — important cases before the highest court this term. It’s certainly the most important immigration case the Supreme Court has...
Texas filed suit in 2018, after several courts ruled that the Trump Administration’s attempt to end DACA was unlawful. It claims that DACA’s creation was procedurally improper and that DACA substantively conflicts with immigration statutes.
14 lip 2023 · In a recent 8-1 ruling in United States v. Texas , the Supreme Court held that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge the agency’s guidance to line-level personnel on how to direct their enforcement efforts.
18 kwi 2016 · Issue: (1) Whether a state that voluntarily provides a subsidy to all aliens with deferred action has Article III standing and a justiciable cause of action under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) to challenge the Secretary of Homeland Security’s guidance seeking to establish a process for considering deferred action for certain aliens beca...
The Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (defendant) issued a statement-of-policy memorandum outlining a process for deferring deportation of aliens who had been in the United States for five years and had a child who was a citizen or lawful permanent resident.
The States of Texas and Louisiana claim that the Guide-lines contravene two federal statutes that they read to require the ar-rest of certain noncitizens upon their release from prison (8 U. S. C. §1226(c)) or entry of a final order of removal (§1231(a)(2)).
5 paź 2022 · In Texas v. United States (DAPA), this court affirmed the grant of injunctive relief. We held that DAPA likely violated procedural APA requirements because it was a substantive rule that required notice and comment.
