Search results
The Court of Claims denied relief, and the Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed, ruling that appellant is an "annuitant" under federal law, rather than an "employee" within the meaning of § 111, and that that section therefore has no application to him.
The Michigan courts ruled that he was not covered by the nondiscrimination provisions of 4 U.S.C. § 111, as he was retired and therefore no longer a federal employee. Davis appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
9 mar 2020 · Court of Claims Orders & Opinions. Summary of COC Orders and Opinions PDF (Updated 1/27/2022) 2020. (Decided 4/28/2020 LPL Fin. Holdings, Inc. v. Eubanks PDF. (Decided 3/27/2020) John P. Blake v. Michigan Department of Treasury PDF. (Decided 3/27/2020) Superior National Bank & Trust Co. v. Michigan Department of Treasury PDF.
Plaintiffs, Duane J. Thomas and Judith A. Lobato, appeal as of right the trial court’s order ruling on their request for a declaratory judgment regarding the validity of 1979 AC, R 206.4(2)(d), a rule promulgated by defendant, the Department of Treasury (Treasury).
21 lip 2022 · defendant Department of Treasury did not err by imposing a negligence penalty against plaintiff under MCL 205.23(3). In Docket No. 356950, plaintiff appeals the trial court’s order in LC No. 14-000185-MT.
15 mar 2011 · STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS TYSON FOODS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED March 15, 2011 v No. 295710 Court of Claims DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, LC No. 05-000159-MT Defendant-Appellant. Before: SHAPIRO, P.J., and HOEKSTRA and TALBOT, JJ. PER CURIAM.
27 sie 2024 · Company v Michigan Department of Treasury (Docket No. 365613), the Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed the Opinion and Order issued by the Court of Claims (Docket No. 21-000242-MT), which had granted Treasury’s motion for summary disposition and denied the Taxpayer’s motion for summary disposition.
