Search results
Brief Fact Summary. Sparks from Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry’s (Defendant’s) train ignited Plaintiff’s stack of straw. The jury found that Defendant negligently operated its train by allowing it to emit large quantities of sparks and live cinders.
28 gru 2023 · Kingston (plaintiff) sued Chicago & N.W. Ry. Co. (defendant) after his property was destroyed by a fire caused by sparks from a locomotive owned by the defendant, which merged with another fire of unknown origin.
Read City of Chicago v. U.S. Dept. of Treasury, 297 F.3d 672, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database
Case opinion for US 7th Circuit CITY OF CHICAGO v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
15 lut 2005 · City of Chicago v. United States Dep't of Treasury, 384 F.3d 429 (7th Cir. 2004) (" City of Chicago II "). To alleviate the funding problem, we took the City up on its suggestion to appoint a special master to retrieve the data from ATF at the City's cost.
Brief Fact Summary. Two fires were the proximate cause of the destruction of Plaintiff’s land. Chicago & N.W. Ry. (Defendant) negligently set one of the fires, therefore, Plaintiff sued Defendant for negligence.
Access the world's largest database of Free Case Briefs for Law Students. Curated from law school case books, includes links for optimal case understanding.
