Search results
1 wrz 2020 · The Court ruled that interstate workers are entitled to California-compliant wage statements, and must receive paychecks timed in compliance with section 204, when their “principal place of work” is California. That test is satisfied when employees spend the majority of work time in California.
23 sty 2024 · On January 18, 2024, the California Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Estrada v. Royalty Carpet Mills, resolving a dispute among the appellate courts and concluding that...
19 lut 2024 · The California Supreme Court’s decision resolved a split between the Courts of Appeal in the Second District and the Fourth District over the question of whether courts have the inherent authority to dismiss PAGA claims with prejudice on manageability grounds.
9 sty 2024 · The trial court awarded summary judgment to the employer. The Court of Appeal affirmed summary judgment. Now, in a rare less-than-unanimous vote, the California Supreme Court granted review.
Following a jury waiver, the court found Lynch had suffered a prior conviction for assault with a firearm (§ 245, subd. (a)(2)) within the meaning of the Three Strikes law, and a prior conviction for domestic violence, which increased the sentencing triad for his current domestic violence convictions (§ 273.5, subd. (f)(1)).
18 sty 2024 · Seyfarth Synopsis: On January 18, 2024, in Estrada v. Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc., the California Supreme Court addressed the split in appellate authority as to whether trial courts have inherent authority to strike a PAGA claim on the grounds that they were not manageable.
24 lip 2023 · In June 2022, we reported on the Viking River case, in which the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the question of whether claims brought under the California Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) could be compelled to arbitration on an individual basis.
