Search results
Case Summary. Procedural Posture. Petitioner challenged the judgment of the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, affirming the lower court's ruling that he had no constitutional right to represent himself at his criminal trial for grand theft, and affirming his conviction. Overview.
Vergara v. California was a lawsuit in the California state courts which dealt with a child's right to education and to instruction by effective teachers. The suit was filed in May 2012 by lawyers on behalf of nine California public school student plaintiffs.
In summary, Justice Blackmun's dissent in Faretta v. California critically examines the majority's reliance on the Sixth Amendment, historical evidence, and the implications of granting a constitutional right to self-representation.
29 sty 2024 · The trial court dismissed the complaint for lack of merit, a decision which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals (CA). The CA held that the petitioner, being a mere employee of TWS, was bound by the acts of her employer, including the decision to terminate the lease and cease operations.
Brief Fact Summary. Plaintiff Moore was a cancer patient at U.C.L.A. Medical Center where his doctor, over a period of several years, removed blood and other bodily fluids from Plaintiff which eventually became a “cell line” and was patented for commercial use, which aggrieved Plaintiff.
Plaintiffs, nine students who were attending California public schools filed suit against the State and several state officials, seeking a court order declaring various provisions of California’s Education Code unconstitutional.
23 cze 2021 · Syllabus. LANGE v. CALIFORNIA. certiorari to the court of appeal of california, first appellate division. No. 20–18. Argued February 24, 2021—Decided June 23, 2021. This case arises from a police officer’s warrantless entry into petitioner Arthur Lange’s garage.
