Search results
11 mar 2023 · Why were Birmingham hip resurfacing systems recalled? In 2015, manufacturer Smith & Nephew voluntarily recalled femoral heads that were 46 millimeters (mm) in diameter and smaller due to a greater risk of dislocation and a need for revision surgery.
1 paź 2024 · Smith & Nephew hip implants named in lawsuits have been the subject of hip replacement recalls or reports of serious complications such as loosening, fractures or the need for revision surgery. At least five models have been the subject of individual lawsuits since 2013.
3 cze 2015 · The record is updated if the FDA identifies a violation and classifies the action as a recall, and it is updated for a final time when the recall is terminated. Learn more about medical device...
18 paź 2023 · Causes for hip replacement recalls include design flaws, early implant failure and migration issues. From 2002 to 2013, Consumer's Union reported 578 metal-on-metal hip replacement recalls involving Biomet, DePuy, Smith & Nephew, Stryker, Wright and Zimmer. People injured are filing lawsuits.
Introduced in 1997, the BIRMINGHAM HIP Resurfacing System was designed using knowledge gained from first-generation metal-on-metal total hips and a thorough understanding of hip resurfacing principles.
1 wrz 1999 · However in June 2015, the BHR manufacturer (Smith & Nephew) issued an urgent field safety notice, with the Australian Government’s device regulatory authority issuing a recall action notification indicating that the use of the BHR was contraindicated in females and recalling femoral and acetabular head components with femoral head sizes < 50 mm .
30 lis 2018 · Multinational Smith & Nephew produced the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing prosthesis while UK-based company Finsbury Orthaeopedics produced the modular head. Clifton alleges both failed with ...
