Search results
The first dimension of the Felder Silverman Learning Style Model (FSLSM) is Sensing vs. Intuitive Learning. Sensing learners tend to be more concrete and practical, preferring information that can be directly observed or experienced.
The sensing/intuitive scale: How do you prefer to take in information? The visual/verbal scale: How do you prefer information to be presented? The sequential/global scale: How do you prefer to organize information? Adapted from: Felder, R. (1996). Matters of Style. ASEE Prism, December, pp. 18-23.
6 kwi 2023 · Intuitive learners focus more on the world of possibility. Unlike sensing learners who are interested in the here and now, intuitive learners enjoy considering ideas, possibilities, and potential outcomes. These learners like abstract thinking, daydreaming, and imagining the future.
The second dimension covers sensing versus intuitive learning. Learners who prefer a sensing learning style like to learn facts and concrete learning material.
Sensing vs. Intuitive —Those who have favor a “sensing” learning style prefer concrete and practical examples and are more comfortable when provided with facts and procedures. Those on the “intuitive” extreme would be comfortable with conceptual and theoretical analyses where issues are less well-defined. 2.
Sensing-Intuitive continuum determines how you prefer to perceive or take in information. Visual-Verbal continuum determines how you prefer information to be presented. Active-Reflective continuum determines how you prefer to process information.
Sensing learners like a methodical approach and real-world connections; intuitive learners like abstractions and innovation. Visual learners remember best what they see; verbal learners get more out of words.
