Yahoo Poland Wyszukiwanie w Internecie

Search results

  1. 22 kwi 2014 · It was held that there was a clear distinction between CPR 7.5 and 6.14; the date when service was effected, and the date on which service was deemed to have taken place. There are cases in which the difference between these two dates can be crucial, T & L was such a case.

  2. 13 sty 2015 · In the recent case of Murphy v Joe O'Toole & Sons Ltd & Anor [2014] IEHC 486, Baker J. held that the limitation period for an agreement for the sale of goods ran from the date of delivery of the goods, rather than from the date of the contract was entered into by the parties.

  3. Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber, extended composition) of 26 October 2000. - Bayer AG v Commission of the European Communities.

  4. 15 sie 2011 · Two recent cases serve as useful reminders of the principles involved in relation to fitness for purpose in the context of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 and the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. Case 1: BSS Group Plc v Makers (UK) Ltd (t/a Allied Services) [2011] EWCA Civ 809 click here.

  5. There is the date when, according to the contract, completion is supposed to occur: the completion date. And there is the date of legal completion itself – when the selling and buying, or granting and taking, actually occurs: actual completion .

  6. 7 sie 2019 · In uk the modern law of sale is largely contained in the sale of goods Act 1979. The sale of goods act is considered as simple. Some of its provisions relating to the quality of goods supplied under the contract are well known.

  7. 31 lip 2015 · In the arbitration, heard in February, the tribunal found that the contract was not a contract for the sale of goods to which the Act applied and that OWBM/ING therefore had a claim under the contract for a debt.

  1. Ludzie szukają również