Search results
Since the envelope containing that decision arrived at Bayer' s registered office on 28 December 1989, the Court of First Instance was entitled to take the view that Bayer was deemed to have taken cognizance of it on that date (paragraph 19).
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber, extended composition) of 26 October 2000. Bayer AG v Commission of the European Communities.
1 lut 2020 · In the December 2019 edition of Synapse, we wrote about case C-688/17 (the Bayer decision) of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which provides guidance on the compensation parties can receive when a patent holder has enforced a preliminary injunction (PI) against them that is later revoked. Here, our European team looks at what ...
Subject-matter. Annulment of the Commission decision concerning a proceeding under Art. 85 of the EC Treaty (IV/34.279/F3) ADALAT ─ Prohibition imposed by the applicant on wholesalers in the various Member States against exporting the pharmaceutical product in question to other Member States ─ Claim for damages.
Bayer Pharma AG v Richter Gedeon Vegyészeti Gyár Nyrt. and Exeltis Magyarország Gyógyszerkereskedelmi Kft. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.
7 maj 2022 · The decision Bayer v Richter of the CJEU has consequences for the national court practice of the EU Member States on the liability of the patent proprietor for damages in case an interim injunction is lifted due to the revocation of the patent. An in-depth analysis of the decision seems necessary.
29 sty 2024 · Bayer shares slumped after the German pharmaceutical and agricultural company was ordered to pay $2.25 billion in damages in the latest setback in its legal battle over its Roundup weed killer.
