Search results
1 sie 2024 · In this section, we take a look at different studies that support the payment for peer review, the $450 debate, and other perspectives in support of the argument. Although voluntary peer review has long been the norm, there are strong arguments in favour of payment for peer review.
22 wrz 2022 · In this two-tiered system, scholars with access to more funding receive premium treatment, while low-income authors can still access standard peer review similar to what authors currently receive for free.
The Lancet reportedly pays for peer review "sometimes". Reviewers for journals published by the American Economic Association earn $100 for each "timely" review. Zentralblatt MATH (zbMATH) pays 2.56 EUR per review, although this is for post-publication reviews that are then published.
23 kwi 2022 · Paying for reviews could increase the pool of reviewers, particularly reaching researchers who cannot afford to work for free. Payment could also increase the motivation to review, encourage increased speed and reviews of improved quality, and might even tap into the pool of retired researchers.
A peer-reviewed journal is one that publishes articles that have been checked by people who are ideally experts in the field and is available to the wider scientific community. Peer review is the critical assessment by unbiased and independent experts of manuscripts submitted to journals.
16 lip 2022 · First, paying peer reviewers would imply increases in subscription fees and article processing charges that many authors and institutions might not be able to afford under restrictive budgeting. Second, a paid peer review would create a new dilemma in manuscript acceptance and rejection policies and whether the payment would be applicable on ...
16 lip 2022 · I support the principle of trialling payment for peer review for the reasons argued by Cheah and Piasecki, and for other reasons as well.
