Search results
A select bibliography is followed by a brief but thought-provoking introduction to the book as a whole, dealing with the following matters: Horace’s early life, the date of Odes 1-3, the ‘Roman Odes’ (first so styled by Plüss 2), Horace and Augustus, Maecenas and other addressees, Horace’s ‘love-poems’, religion in Horace, the ...
This study presents a more holistic interpretation of the ode by exploring Horace's interactions with previously unnoticed (Alcaeus, frr. 45 and 347) and underappreciated (Hes. Op. 582–96) archaic Greek poetic intertexts, which also offer a fresh perspective on earlier debates.
4 lip 2014 · A. W. Verrall wrote in 1884 that Horace's great Maecenas-ode, 3.29, was ‘insipid’ in its most philosophic moments if it was read only for its apparent meaning, that is, as a lecture on a philosophy of life.
A Commentary on Horace, Odes Book III (review) (PDF) A Commentary on Horace, Odes Book III (review) | Alessandro Barchiesi - Academia.edu Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
27 maj 2004 · Books. A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book III, Book 3. R. G. M. Nisbet, Niall Rudd. OUP Oxford, May 27, 2004 - Literary Criticism - 389 pages. This book is a successor to the...
1 sty 2006 · Book 3 is one of the most difficult texts of Augustan poetry, and it is a relief to have a commentary at this level of competence. The format of the new commentary is the same as Nisbet–Hubbard,...
This paper contends that Horace's comparison of his completed poetic monument to pyramids at the end of Odes 1–3 is both figurative and literal insofar as we possess ample art historical, literary …
