Search results
3 sty 2012 · The only thing you get from a 18-105 is a distance scale in/on the lens but give up 85 -105 at twice the price. I doubt if there is much difference in weight. Both the 18-105 & 16-85 share the same 67mm filter size. Handy when you have a 70-300 VR lens so you can share filters between lens.
17 lis 2012 · The real actual visable difference is that the 16-85 is wider and that last 2 mm is significant for some people (me for instance), just as the extra reach is of the 18-105 is for others. This summarizes one of the claims why 18-105mm wins in Cost-to-Image-Quality ratio over the 16-85mm, and why the 16-85mm wins with its wider end over the 18 ...
Simply stated, my 18-105 is exceptionally sharp at all focal lengths and apertures; even more than my 16-85. The 16-85 is built better, has a metal mounting ring, and is slightly faster focussing. I realize that these lenses have some sample to sample variation but my questions are as follows; 1.
The only reason to get the 16-85 over the 18-105 is if you value the 2mm on the wide side. Otherwise no real reason to spend the extra money on a pretty expensive slow lens. Why does everyone have a speed obsession? Sharpness, contrast and VR all matter as well.
15 sty 2021 · W sumie zauważalnie najtańszy i odstający cena jest 18-105 ale czy warto? Nigdy nie miałem do czynienia z tymi obiektywami a jeden uniwersalny zoom chciałbym mieć, który polecacie? Zdjęcia raczej na zewnątrz niż w pomieszczeniach, krajobraz/natura/architektura takie cos do wszystkiego po trochę.
29 gru 2008 · I had a chance to compare 18-105 with 16-85 and found that 16-85 was MUCH superior to 18-105 in all aspects: sharpness, contrast and colors. 18-200 is also better 18-105 as I recall. 16-85 is the best consumer lens for now, I believe.
13 gru 2009 · Here's my highly unscientific test of the kit 18-105 versus 16-85. I actually tested two copies of the 16-85, one grey market the other USA warranty - couldn't tell any differences between the two. As for the differences between the 18-105 and the 16-85, they were quite noticable.
