Search results
After the Ad had begun to run on city buses, New York's Mayor, Rudolph Giuliani ("Mayor," "Rudy" or "Giuliani"), requested Deputy Mayor Randy Mastro to notify the MTA that the Ad should be pulled because it violated his rights under Section 50 of the New York Civil Rights Law ("Section 50"). [1]
Dostarczamy wiadomości i ciekawe informacje z życia Chicago. Zawsze aktualne wydarzenia - zapisz się i otrzymuj newsy na email.
The Supreme Court's decision in Clinton v. City of New York is grounded in a thorough examination of the constitutional principles governing the legislative process, with particular focus on the Presentment Clause (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2) of the United States Constitution.
Get free and accurate case briefs based on popular law school casebooks. Ensure you're studying the right elements with our comprehensive case summaries.
27 kwi 1998 · In a 6-to-3 decision the Court first established that both the City of New York, and its affiliates, and the farmers' cooperative suffered sufficiently immediate and concrete injuries to sustain their standing to challenge the President's actions.
Tydzien 48 Rok XXXI Nr 1083 27 Listopada 2024
President Clinton exercised his authority under the Act to cancel one provision in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 and two provisions in the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997. Two separate actions were filed in District Court against President Clinton and other federal officials challenging these cancellations.
