Search results
I feel the main difference is the style of programming that both languages invite you to do. Matlab is an imperative, procedural language; whereas Mathematica is a language which supports both imperative and declarative programming, but is mostly an (impure) functional language.
18 wrz 2022 · Matlab is good in making functions but Mathematica is good for calculus and equation. Matlab can’t be a scientific calculator whereas Mathematica is good for being a scientific calculator. Mathematica is fast to do symbolic calculations as compared to Matlab.
12 wrz 2015 · I built hundreds of matlab scripts to facilitate the procedure. You can do the same thing with Mathematica using Packages but the learning curve is a bit steeper. Mathematica 's symbolic manipulation is far better and easier to use than Matlab. I think the graphics in both systems are great.
Rectangle[{xmin, ymin}, {xmax, ymax}] represents an axis-aligned filled rectangle from {xmin, ymin} to {xmax, ymax}. Rectangle[{xmin, ymin}] corresponds to a unit square with its bottom-left corner at {xmin, ymin}.
area = rectint(A,B) returns the area of intersection of the rectangles specified by position vectors A and B. If A and B each specify one rectangle, the output area is a scalar. A and B can also be matrices, where each row is a position vector.
23 maj 2024 · The comparison between MATLAB and Mathematica in terms of integration with toolboxes, external libraries, and interfacing with other languages highlights the strengths and limitations of each platform.
2 paź 2011 · Based on Raskolnikov's answer here, one can build an implicit Cartesian equation for a $2p \times 2q$ rectangle: $$\left (\frac {x} {p}\right)^2+\left (\frac {y} {q}\right)^2=\sec\left (\arctan\left (\frac {x} {p},\frac {y} {q}\right)-\frac {\pi} {2}\left\lfloor\frac2 {\pi}\arctan\left (\frac {x} {p},\frac {y} ...
