Search results
The ‘au dehors’ (outside) nature of fully secret trusts is demonstrated in the Re Keen (1937) Ch case which involved sailors who were sailing on orders written in a letter which was sealed. The question for the courts was whether the sailors were sailing under orders – even though the letter in the envelope was unread – and they didn ...
{¶1} Defendant-appellant Zachariah Keen appeals his conviction and sentence on one count of felonious assault entered in the Knox County Court of Common Pleas Court following a guilty plea.
Key point. A sealed letter to be opened upon the testator’s passing constitutes sufficient communication of a secret trust; Facts. The will of K included clause 5 which instructed trustees to hold the sum of £10,000 ‘upon trust and disposed of by them among such person, persons or charities as may be notified by me to them or either of them during my lifetime’
23 lut 2009 · Keen thinks the law is found in the plain meaning of the written law. His opinion is a more sophisticated version of the philosophy of law articulated by Truepenny. The main difference between them is that Keen is more strict about the role of the judiciary.
On November 29, 1973, the petitioner, Nathaniel Brown, stole a 1965 Chevrolet from a parking lot in East Cleveland, Ohio. Nine days later, on December 8, 1973, Brown was caught driving the car in Wickliffe, Ohio.
Explore the intricate facets of the groundbreaking Terry V. Ohio case, a landmark decision in the US legal system. This in-depth analysis of the case will reveal its significance, examine the historical perspective of the 1968 ruling, and look at the ways it has shaped amendment rights.
Significance: Terry v. Ohio (1968) Ohio is a significant case that established the “stop and frisk” exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement.
