Search results
Tu znajdziesz ważne informacje dotyczące obsługi ekspresów do kawy JURA oraz odpowiedzi na najczęściej zadawane pytania (FAQ).
- Serwis
Serwis Centrum Serwisowe Jeżeli Państwa urządzenie wymaga...
- Części zamienne
Oryginalne części zamienne JURA są do siebie idealnie...
- Co Robić a Czego Nie Robić
Do usuwania kamienia nie wolno stosować płynnych środków do...
- Infolinia & Pomoc DLA Klientów
JURA Poland Sp. z o.o. Pulawska 366 02-819 Warszawa Poland...
- Warunki gwarancji
*Administratorem danych osobowych osób przesyłających...
- Terminy & technologia
Ekspresy do kawy JURA: wyjaśnienie terminów i symboli.
- Pomoc produktowa
Tu znajdziesz odpowiedzi na najczęściej zadawane pytania...
- Opieka po okresie gwarancji
Poniżej przedstawiamy wysokość stawek obsługi...
- Serwis
27 sty 2021 · The New York City Department of Education maintained and operated an entirely separate school district for students with disabilities known as District 75. Students in District 75 were pulled from Staten Island public schools.
2 sie 2021 · August 24, 2021. ELECTRONIC ORDER: The defendants letter application #6 for an extension of time to serve and file an answer is DENIED without prejudice to re-file their application addressed to MJ Levy who will be handling all pre-trial matters in this litigation. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 8/24/2021.
New York City Department of Education, No. 1:2021cv06317 - Document 38 (S.D.N.Y. 2022) Court Description: ORDER denying 26 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 32 Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties move for summary judgment.
In this class action lawsuit, Z.Q. v. NYC DOE, the plaintiffs claim that the NYC Department of Education violated their rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (and other related laws) because of the NYC Department of Education failed to provide students with disabilities with (1) the level of education that the students are legally entitled to during the time of remote ...
D.A. was a child with autism whose parents (plaintiffs) unilaterally placed D.A. in a private school based on their belief that the New York City Department of Education (DOE) (defendant) had failed to provide D.A. with a free appropriate public education (FAPE).
27 mar 2011 · Plaintiffs-Appellants T.Y. and K.Y., on behalf of their son, T.Y., appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Johnson, J.) granting summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee New York City Department of Education, Region 4.
