Search results
An inductive argument is one whose premises are claimed to provide only some less-than-conclusive grounds for accepting the conclusion (Copi 1978; Hurley and Watson 2018).
- His Works on Logic
Using the same definition of terms, we are left with: Major...
- Rationalist
Continental Rationalism. Continental rationalism is a...
- Francis Bacon
To take the place of the established tradition (a miscellany...
- Analytic Tradition
Analytic Philosophy. The school of analytic philosophy has...
- Propositional Logic
Propositional Logic. Propositional logic, also known as...
- Behaviorism
Behaviorism. Behaviorism was a movement in psychology and...
- His Works on Logic
6 wrz 2004 · An inductive logic is a logic of evidential support. In a deductive logic, the premises of a valid deductive argument logically entail the conclusion, where logical entailment means that every logically possible state of affairs that makes the premises true must make the conclusion true as well.
6 wrz 2004 · An inductive logic is a system of evidential support that extends deductive logic to less-than-certain inferences. For valid deductive arguments the premises logically entail the conclusion, where the entailment means that the truth of the premises provides a guarantee of the truth of the conclusion.
Inductive reasoning is a form of argument that—in contrast to deductive reasoning—allows for the possibility that a conclusion can be false, even if all of the premises are true. [39] This difference between deductive and inductive reasoning is reflected in the terminology used to describe deductive and inductive arguments.
10 mar 2021 · Inductive arguments whose premises give us a strong, even if defeasible, reason for accepting the conclusion are called, unsurprisingly, strong inductive arguments. In contrast, an inductive argument that does not provide a strong reason for accepting the conclusion are called weak inductive arguments.
Definition. Inductive arguments are reasoning processes where the premises provide some degree of support for the conclusion, leading to a probable but not guaranteed outcome.
These are distinguished by their aim— a deductive argument attempts to provide premises that guarantee, that is, necessitate, its conclusion.