Search results
Chief Justice Roberts contrasted the error in Herring with the police conduct in Weeks v. United United States , 232 U.S. 383 (1914), in which officers broke into the defendant’s house, confiscated papers,
The paper contemplates how an actual precrime system would struggle to fit into the framework of inchoate crimes as they are currently defined, but might fit into a system of preventative detention that is not dramatically inconsistent with the approaches currently used in the United States.
Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009) - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. Filed: 2009-01-14 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 555 U.S. 135, 129 S. Ct. 695, 172 L. Ed. 2d 496, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 581 Docket: 07-513 Supreme Court Database id: 2008-009
Get Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.
Herring was indicted on federal gun and drug possession charges and moved to suppress the evidence on the ground that his initial arrest had been illegal. Assuming that there was a Fourth Amendment violation, the District Court concluded that the exclusionary rule did not apply and denied the motion to suppress.
21 paź 2014 · Whether the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies when a police officer makes an arrest after receiving information from a different law enforcement agency that an outstanding warrant exists, and that in formation was incorrect because of a negligent error by that agency in failing to remove the warrant from its files. A.
19 lut 2008 · Facts of the case The Coffee County, Alabama Sheriff's Department apprehended Bennie Herring in July of 2004. Upon searching Herring's vehicle, officers discovered methamphetamine in Herring's pocket and a gun under the seat of his truck.
