Search results
16 gru 2013 · Our review highlights how the three perspectives shed light on categorical dynamics in creative industries, while building on different levels of analysis, involving different number and types of actors and yielding different insights depending on the stages of industry evolution.
The DCMS classifies enterprises and occupations as creative according to what the enterprise primarily produces, and what the worker primarily does. Thus, a company which produces records would be classified as belonging to the music industrial sector, and a worker who plays piano would be classified as a musician.
Cultural industries are associated with “traditional” sectors such as cultural heritage, visual and performing arts, publishing, music, cinema, radio, television, print and photography, while creative industry category begins to include the new sector of the digital
We should highlight at the outset that the research presented here works within the confines of the current classification systems relating to industry sector (Standard Industrial Classification – SIC) and occupation (Standard Occupational Classification. SOC).
This framework helps to integrate findings of consumption surveys and to explain the emergence of new artistic genres as a form of ritual classification. Societies' artistic classification systems vary along four dimensions: differentiation, hierarchy, universality, and boundary strength.
The arts have been classified as seven: painting, architecture, sculpture, literature, music, performing, and cinema.
The current classification system used by DCMS has been in existence for a considerable period of time – since the first estimates were produced in 1998. It has a substantial and positive...
