Search results
Get free access to the complete judgment in Anvar P.V v. P.K Basheer And Others on CaseMine.
18 wrz 2014 · Anvar P.V vs P.K.Basheer & Ors on 18 September, 2014. Warning on translation. Get this document in PDF. Print it on a file/printer. Download Court Copy. Select the following parts of the judgment. Facts. Issues. Petitioner's Arguments.
23 lip 2020 · P.K Basheer case overruled the Navjot Sandhu case to the extent of the above-mentioned statement. The bench rightly opined that the Supreme Court in the Navjot Sandhu case failed to take into account Section 59 and Section 65A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and thus arrived at a wrong conclusion.
20 cze 2020 · Civil Appeal No. 4226/2012. Before Chief Justice R.M. Lodha, Justice Kurian Joseph, and Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman. Decided on September 18, 2014. Relevancy of the case: Admissibility of electronic records under Section 65B. Statutes & Provisions Involved.
Anvar.P.V vs P.K.Basheer Author: M.Sasidharan Nambiar ... a finding would have to be made in favour of the petitioner without any evidence at all. In other ... as the President of the E.P.No.3/2011 154 Panchayath and the fact that PW4 is a leader of UDF and a co-worker of the first respondent, consent of the first respondent is to be infered ...
7 lut 2015 · The Honourable Supreme Court in Anvar P.V. vs. P.K. Basheer overruled the part of the judgment held by that Court in State (NCT of Delhi) vs. Navjot Sandhu alias Afsan Guru, relating to...
22 wrz 2014 · Recently, in the case of Anvar P. K. vs. P.K Basheer & ors. (dated 18 September, 2014), Supreme Court overruled the statement of law on admissibility of secondary evidence pertaining to electronic record, as held by the court in case of State (NCT of Delhi) v Navjot Sandhu alias Afsal Guru (2005) 11 SCC 600 .
