Search results
in most classrooms is corrective feedback, which focuses on learners’ errors (Hattie & Timperley, 2007, p. 91). It has been argued, most notably by Krashen (1982, 1985) and Truscott (1996, 1999), that corrective feedback can be harmful to language acquisition, that it leads to no demonstrable gains
delayed feedback is effective in L2 learning and positively viewed by learners in distance language learning programs. Corrective Feedback and the Role of Feedback Timing
1 lip 2021 · Students value immediate feedback, while teachers prefer to delay their feedback. •. Teacher and learner beliefs are influenced by sociocultural and contextual factors. •. Teacher and learner beliefs are influenced by their experiences.
26 lut 2021 · This chapter summarizes research on the timing of written and oral corrective feedback (CF) on L2 grammatical errors. A careful analysis of a comprehensive array of CF timing studies indicates that there are learning benefits from both immediate and delayed CF.
27 lip 2014 · Results suggested that when lag to test is controlled, feedback timing may have little effect on L2 vocabulary learning regardless of the frequency of errors during learning. Get full access to this article. View all access and purchase options for this article. Get Access. References. Barcroft J. (2007).
This article reports on a study exploring the differential effects of immediate and delayed corrective feedback (CF) on the acquisition of the English past tense. One hundred and forty-five seventh-grade EFL learners were assigned to four groups: Immediate CF, Delayed CF, Task Only, and Control.
1 lut 2011 · The present results on the influence of delayed feedback are largely consistent with recent studies demonstrating reduced learning when feedback was delayed by a few seconds (Maddox et al., 2003; Lieberman et al., 2008).
