Search results
A summary of Section X in David Hume's An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Learn exactly what happened in this chapter, scene, or section of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding and what it means. Perfect for acing essays, tests, and quizzes, as well as for writing lesson plans.
A miracle may be accurately defined a transgression of a law of nature by a particular volition of the Deity or by the interposition of some invisible agent .
David Hume, An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748) 579 26. Sometimes an event may not, in itself, seem to be contrary to the laws of nature, and yet, if it were real, it might by reason of some circumstances be denominated a miracle, because, in fact, it is contrary to these laws. Thus, if a person claiming
1859, Hume argued powerfully that human reason is fundamentally similar to that of the other animals, founded on instinct rather than quasi-divine insight into things.
Summary. Part 1. The results of Hume 's investigation into the nature of the human mind lead him to consider the belief in miracles. More specifically, he is interested in whether or not such belief is justified. His conclusion is that there is not sufficient evidence to justify believing in them.
In the very paragraph where Hume first defines ‘miracle,’ he says that “it is a miracle, that a dead man should come to life” (E 115: 143). What is more revealing is the reason he gives: “because that has never been observed in any age or country.”
focus on the response to David Hume’s celebrated argument against miracles that Thomas Bayes would have made and did in part make, albeit from beyond the grave, through his colleague Richard Price.
